Uppsala University Library, Gr. 4
Tetraevangelium
11th c.
parchment
i, 211, i' leaves
Greek
f. VIIIv: Evangelist portrait (Matthew)
ff. Vv–VIIr Pinax of Matthew’s chapters in red ink flanked by a synoptic table.
f. VIIr Scribal invocation: ‘Χ(ρίστ)ε προἡγοῦ τῶν ἐμῶν πονιμάτων· εὔχ(ου) τῶ γράψαντι. / εὐαγγέλιον κατα ματθαίον.’
There is a lacuna because of a loss of a bifolium between f. 190v and f. 191r: des. f. 190v: ‘πρὸς τὸν πέμψαντά με· καὶ οὕ δεῖς ἐξ᾽ὑ[...’ inc. f. 191r: ‘]σαν ἀληθῶς ὅτι παρὰ σοῦ ἐξῆλθον.’
A modern hand continued the passage ending f. 199r at f. 200r to the end of the Gospel (Jn 21:25): inc. f. 200r: ‘αὐτῷ τὸ τρίτον, φιλεῖς με. καὶ ειπεν αυτῶ κύριε, σὺ πὰντα διδας,.... τὰ γραφόμενα βιβλία. Τέλος τοῦ εὐαγγελίου κατὰ Ίωάννην· Ἰ(ησοῦ)ς.’
Foliation
Collation
Textblock
Ii I-VIII - separate quire Bookblock: The first extant quire signature is γ´ at f. 17r; it is written in a small majuscule script and flanked by a red dot, at the uppermost right hand corner of the folio; previous signatures were probably trimmed (see the rubrics partly cut off at ff. 12v–13r). There may be a trace of signature at f. 25r. στ´ is extant at f. 41r and is also repeated on the lower external corner of f. 48v. Compare to the gamma, this signature appears written in darker brown ink and is topped by two small horizontal traits: the first is straighter and longer, and has a dot in the middle; the second is a small curve capping that central dot. I 1-8; II 9-16; III 17-24; IV 25-32; V 33-40; VI 41-48; VII 49-56 (back signature fragmentary); VIII 57-64 (no front signature but fragment of back signature eta); IX 65-72 (theta is front signature, but back signature missing); X 73-80 no extant signature; XI 81-88 (NB signature on f. 81r appears to be iota; however, there does not seem to be a problem with the sequence of the text; no back signature); XII 89-95 8-1 ( f. 92 is detached from the binding; the missing folio, between f. 91 and f. 92, contained the end of the Pinax to Luke and the Evangelist portrait; no quire signatures); XIII 96-103 (signature ιγ heavily rubbed out at f. 96r); XIV 104-111 (again signature ι at f. 104r, neatly written in brown ink; perhaps a later addition? at f. 111v there is the correct signature, partly cut off: ιδ´); XV 112-119 (at f. 112r, a fragment of the signature ιε´ is visible; no back sign.); XVI 120-127 (part of sign. ιστ´ is visible with a line below it; the back signature is fully extant); XVII 128-135 (part of sign. ιζ´ is visible with a line below it; the back signature is fully extant); XVIII 136-143 (signature ιη´ is fully extant, with two lines above and one below at f. 136r; the back signature is almost fully visible); XIX 144-151 (signature ιθ´ at f. 144r is partly cut off; the back signature is fully extant); XX 152-155 /4/ (there is a trace of the ornaments to the front signature; there is the shadow of a back signature κ´ at f. 155v, hardly visible in the lower left corner); XXI 156-163 (faint traces of both front and back signatures; the sewing of this quire is very lose); XXII 164-171 (traces of front signature only); XXIII 172-179 (traces of back signature only); XXIV 180-187 (no traces of signatures); XXV 188-193 /8-2/ (back signature fully extant: κε´; the missing leaves belong to the internal bifolium, and the note "Duo folia desunt" was written in neat writing in pencil in the lower margin of f. 190v; there is a lacuna in the text); ΧXVI 194-199 /8-2/ (trace of front signature; the last two folios were cut off).Condition
Binding/Endleaves
Good, except for the one leaf of the beginning of Luke’s Gospel, which is entirely detached (NB Piltz records the beginning of Luke’s Gospel as missing because she may not have seen this leaf at all - perhaps it was not in the correct place). A neat rectangle of parchment has been cut off (with scissors) from the lower right corner of f. 93 and f. 99 .Script
Textblock
Hand 1
(ff. 1r–66r)The main hand writes a fluid and regular minuscule of small module, upright, a little bit squashed to the line, with small, angular breathings and short, neat accents, but rather large wavy compendia for standard abbreviations. The ink colour is black in the first part, which makes me incline towards considering this hand a thirteenth-century imitation of an earlier hand; the small zeta goes below the line and is often set at an angle; also a feature is the ligature delta-iota. This hand only employs distinctive double-lines initials filled in red ink, such as (f. 7r) (o), (f. 15v) (k), (f. 19r) (h), (ff. 20v–21r) (k), (f. 36v) (p), (f. 37r) (t), (f. 37v) (many), (f. 43r) (p, o), (f. 56v) (large epsilon with bird and whole title) // (Mark) (f. 63r) (epsilon filled in red, but not with double lines), (f. 65r) (a, ornate with flourish and knot). Only hand 1 writes the harmony in the lower margin.Hand 2
(ff. 66v–91v)The ink colour of the main text changes at (f. 66v) to light brown; the ductus is also altered, perhaps in part because of how the pen is cut, into a rather more nebulous, ill-defined result (esp. on flesh-side pages); although still small and regular, the writing appears slightly more slanting to the right; the breathings are "a chiodo" and the compendia are kept short; majuscule kappas are elongated and hooked ((f. 68v)); some letter nuclei are filled in red ink (though this may be a later addition; but cf. (f. 96v) where it seems original); beta is often majuscule in two separate loops; from (f. 75v) the writing becomes at once neater and more fluid, almost as if the first scribe is the one now writing in a dark brown ink; the neatness of the pages is in regular alternation until (f. 90v). The pinax at (ff. 91r–91v) is in classical dark red ink and neat script.Hand 3
(ff. 92r–155r)This hand is also tiny and consciously written as pendant from the line; it adds minute boules or hooks to the very short traits of letters such as chi, lambda, phi. It is a little more irregular. (f. 95r) is written with the lines slanting downwards to the right, without very visible horizontal ruling; NB the genealogy list on (f. 99v) is written in three columns. Around (f. 111r) the hand style becomes rounder and more manneristic, perhaps with another change in hand which is difficult to pinpoint; (f. 112r), for example, exhibits a thinner ductus giving it a more staccato effect. These small variations, that may or may not be of the same hand, make me think this is a later imitative script rather than a genuine 11th-century minuscule. Rare flourishes in the lower margin at (ff. 136v–137r). Note that the pinax at (f. 155r) is not written in red ink, but only rubricated in red.Additions
Textblock
Decorations
Textblock
Canon tables with zoomorphic and Orientalizing architectural decoration, in black and red ink, the columns filled with a beige wash (yellow spalmature?). Evangelist portraits, full-page on gold backgrounds: Matthew at (f. VIIIv); size of page: 149 x 110 mm; size of illustration: 109 x 83 mm. NB the bottom margin of the illumination is slanting to the right. There are traces of a border in red ink around the gold background, which seems painted rather than executed in gold leaf. Mark at (f. 58r): size of page: 148 x 113 mm; size of illustration: 105 x 83 mm. The red frame is fully preserved. The name is written in the top margin, in minuscule, in dark red ink: μάρκος. The words, ἀρχὴ τοῦ ἑυαγγελί, are written on the white page on the lectern. The writing instruments are more precisely outlined, with the same use of white ink/wash. Luke - missing leaf. John at (f. 155v): size of page: 148 x 113 mm; size of illustration 103 x 82 mm. The red outer frame is only preserved in the top and right sides, and fragments of it in the other two sides. The deep ruled lines of the page appear to have caused substantial pigment loss to the lower left portion of the image, mainly the throne on which John is sitting. The words of Jn 1:1 are written on the lectern in brown ink against a white background: ἐν ἀρχὴ ἦν ὁ λόγος καὶ ὁ λόγος ἦν. The lineaments of face and hair are very detailed and beautifully preserved and John’s pose is very solemn and at the same time silently relaxed. Headpiece pyle "in negativo" in red ink, with four small palmettes at the corners, at (f. 1r). Another interlaced pyle "in negativo" at (f. 58v), outlined in bright red with touches of black ink; above it is a self-standing interlaced knot. At (f. 92r), simple pyle in dark red ink with vegetable scroll in negativo, side palmettes and central “knot” as a rounded four-lobed cross with star rays in the background. Note that in this case the red ink is the same as the pinax ink, and there is no use of black. At (f. 156r), pyle in brick red in negativo with geometrical motifs and elongated palmettes at the top corners; short scrolling volutes at the lower corners; and two free-standing interlaced knots in the upper margin. An evident cross precedes the writing of the title. The ink of this pyle is the same as that of the rubrication for this page, but different from that of the pinax (it is darker, almost brown). Zoomorphic initial epsilon outlined and ornamented at (f. 56v), where a small bird is perched on the vegetable volutes that sprout in the lower part of the initial. Double-traced alpha with volute and knotted ornament at (f. 65r).
Binding
The flyleaves are paper; the watermarks are the remains of a neat cross with double lines on the front flyleaf, and that of a rampant lion with curled tail, standing on a pedestal with a volute ornament, cf. Heawood 391 (Holland, end of the 17th cent.). The first 8 leaves are also original parchment the last 4 leaves are of newer parchment.
Origin
Acquisition
- Graux (1889), pp. 30–31.
- Rudberg (MS).
